Samples

We respect our customers and value the work we do for each of them.

When clients first start cooperating with Smart Custom Writing, they are proposed to take a look at the written samples our writers have done. Those illustrate the variety of topics that we cover. The number of words we can deal with even for the 6-hour deadlines. The academic prosperity you are about to get with the completed written paper from our experts. And the knowledge of the most differ types and styles a paper can have.

Thus at first, we would like to open up a curtain of writing samples we have carefully been preparing for years. Come and take a look at them. Don`t see the necessary one? Contact our support department for any side help you might need.

Place your order

* Prices start at$15

Total price:

Proceed to order

Ratio Analysis of PepsiCo.

Question 1 Trends in profitability 

 

2008

2007

2006

Return on Equity (ROE)

42.10%

32.70%

-

Return on Assets (ROA)

14.30%

16.30%

-

Return on Net Assets (RONA)

18.60%

21.10%

-

Return on Sales (ROS)

11.90%

14.30%

16.10%

Operating Profit Margin (OPM)

16.00%

18.20%

18.50%

The above tabulated ratios have been used to analyze trends in profitability. Pepsi has declining profitability as indicated by the ROA, RONA, ROS and OPM while ROE indicates an increase in profitability. While the ROA is calculated by dividing the net income by total assets to indicate the efficiency in generating profits from the company’s assets, RONA is calculated by dividing the net income and average total assets (Investopedia, 2016). In addition the ROS considers the net income before interest and tax and dividing this by sales while the OPM is calculated from the division of profit before interest and tax by the sales revenue. Further, the ROE is calculated from dividing the net income and average shareholders’ funds (Kaplan Financial Limited, 2012).

On one hand, the increase in ROE differs from the decline in all the other ratios in light of the denominator used. The ROE uses equity which indicates increased efficiency that might be attributable to high liabilities that have been obtained by the company in 2008. On the other hand the ROA and RONA use assets as the common denominator and reflect how efficiently companies use assets to generate profits. For Pepsi, the industry it operates in is asset intensive. Thus, the both the ROA and RONA indicate a decrease in efficiency towards production of profits.  Further, the decrease in ROS and OPM indicate decreasing efficiencies in production and selling efficiencies (Kaplan Financial Limited, 2012). From the above ratios reflect a decrease in profitability levels.

Question 2.Trends in debt 

 

2008

2007

2006

Debt-to-equity

67.40%

24.30%

 

Debt-to-total capital

22.90%

12.10%

 

Times Interest Earned (EBIT/Interest Expense)

22.3

35.1

30.5

While the debt-to-equity ratio is calculated by dividing the long-term debt over equity (Kaplan Financial Limited, 2012), the debt-to-total capital is obtained by dividing total debt by summation of shareholders’ equity and debt (Investopedia, 2016). Both ratios show an increase when compared to the previous year indicating that the company has obtained both long-term and short-term debt. This is consistent with the ROE as indicated under the profitability ratios. In addition, the EBIT/ Interest expense indicates that the company has a decreased ability to pay dividends from profits. The times interest earned ratio  is still healthy since it is above 2% and may be decreasing due to both the decrease in profitability and increased debt (Kaplan Financial Limited, 2012).

Question 3.Ability of the company to meet its financial obligations

The ratios used are the current and quick ratios to indicate the liquidity of Pepsi. To begin with, the current ratio is calculated by dividing the current assets by current liabilities. For Pepsi, the current ratio has decreased to 1.23 in 2008 (1.31; 2007) which can be a result of the increase in short term debt the company obtained as indicated by the debt-to-total capital. Secondly, the quick ratio has also decreased from 0.32 in 2007 to 0.26 in 2008. The ratio is calculated by dividing current assets, less inventory, by the current liabilities. Although the above ratios are low, they are within the industry range and due to debt; the company is still able to meet its obligations (Kaplan Financial Limited, 2012).

Question 4.How efficiently the company is using its assets

 

2008

2007

Asset Turnover

0.83

0.88

Revenue Growth

9.60%

12.30%

Asset Growth

3.90%

 

Days Receivable

39.5

40.6

Days Inventory

45.2

46.3

The reduction in the asset turnover, revenue growth, day’s receivable and day’s inventory indicates a decrease in the efficient use of assets. It is also evident from the table above that the decrease in the ratios is minimal. However, in light of the profitability ratios discussed above, there is a decrease in efficiency. Further, the asset growth ratio has no comparative figure but is low.  All this ratios indicate that Pepsi has reduced the efficient use of its assets from the previous year. 

Place an order